by
Demetris
I. Loizos, B.A., M.A./M.Phil, D.HA
History
Professor
Yalta or Jalta is a city
located on the Crimean peninsula, nowadays in southern Ukraine. In 1928 it had a
population of about 30,000 and it was the center of the health resorts in the
Black Sea. However, when the Germans evacuated the area during the Second World
War, they caused damages to all the buildings and, therefore, in 1945 it was a
ruined city with roofless houses.[1]
This was the place that was chosen by the Big Three (F. Roosevelt, W. Churchill
and J. Stalin) as a meeting point in early 1945. Two Palaces from the tsarist
era were to offer hospitality to the three delegations. The plenary sessions of
the meeting were held every afternoon at the Livadia Palace, while the meetings
of the Ministers of Foreign Affairs as well as the military talks took place in
the Yusupov Palace in the mornings.[2]
One of the focal points of discussion in Yalta was the Polish issue that
consisted of two major questions. The first one was the border line on both the
west and the east side of Poland and the second question was who was going to
govern the country.[3]
Concerning the Polish frontiers, the Russians aimed at the annexation of part of
the eastern territories of Poland which, in fact, were part of Russia before the
Russo-Polish war of 1920-1921. In 1921 the Treaty of Riga set the Polish
frontier 150 miles east of the Curzon line[4]
and a considerable number of Russians found themselves under Polish
administration. It was also true, however, that about one million Poles lived to
the east of the Riga frontier and therefore an ethnologically precise settlement
of the border was unrealistic.[5]
On the other hand, the problem of the Polish government was difficult as
well. In early 1945 there were two Polish governments. One of them was in exile
in London and it was referred to as the London Poles or London Government; the
other one was in Lublin (Poland) and it was referred to as the Lublin Committee
or the Lublin Government. The London Government was composed of the members of
the Polish Government who had fled the country at the beginning of World War II
while the Lublin Government consisted of young Poles who had remained in the
country during the war and belonged to the Left. In January 1945, the Lublin
Committee, being pro-Soviet, declared itself the Provisional Government of
Poland and it was immediately recognized by the USSR.[6]
Stalin justified this action of recognition in the following
words:
I think that Poland cannot be left without a government. Accordingly, the
Soviet Government has agreed to recognize the Provisional Polish Government
[...] I hope that events will show that our recognition of the Polish Government
in Lublin is in keeping with the interests of the common cause of the Allies and
that it will help accelerate the defeat of Germany.[7]
Stalin had already expressed his views clearly on this issue in a letter
to Roosevelt:
We cannot tolerate a situation in
which terrorists, instigated by Polish emigres
[non-communist elements who had left Poland after the beginning of the war]
assassinate Red Army soldiers and officers in Poland, wage a criminal struggle
against the Soviet forces engaged in liberating Poland and directly aid our
enemies, with whom they are virtually in league. [...] It should be borne in
mind that the Soviet Union, more than any other Power, has a stake in
strengthening a pro-Ally and democratic Poland [...] because the Polish problem
is inseparable from that of the security of the Soviet Union. To this I should
add that the Red Army's success in fighting the Germans in Poland largely
depends on a tranquil and reliable rear in Poland, and the Polish National
Committee [Lublin Poles] is fully cognisant of this circumstance, whereas the
emigre
Government [London Poles] and its underground agents by their acts of terror
threaten civil war [...][8]
Stalin rushed to recognize the Lublin Government in Poland because it was
loyal to the communists; he needed stability and tranquility in the rear of the
Red Army when the final offensive against Germany began in mid-January 1945.
Also, in this way, the London Government (anticommunist) would not have been
able to take over in Poland when the war would come to an end, although it was
the legal Polish Government. Furthermore, Stalin was aware of how much the Poles
disliked the Russians when they recalled the Soviet foreign policy before the
war. The Poles remembered well the Soviet policy of partition that had been
followed after a secret agreement between the USSR and Germany in 1939
(Ribendrop-Molotov Pact). After all, the whole history of Russo-Polish relations
is a history of mutual mistrust and national hatred. Therefore, Stalin had to
secure the support of the Polish Government in order to prevent any action of
the Poles against the Soviet army. Stalin would also like the idea of using in
the future Poland as a buffer state between the Soviet Union and the West: a
tsarist policy that had been followed after the 18th
century.
Both Roosevelt and Churchill expressed their disappointment with Stalin's
action and sent messages to him saying that the Polish question should be
discussed in detail at the Crimean conference.[9]
Churchill was much more distressed because he had tried to prevent Russian
influence in Poland using the London Government. A meeting was arranged between
Stalin and Mikolajczyk (head of the London Poles) in 1944 to solve their
differences. The London Government, however, did not want to accept the Curzon
line although this solution was supported by all three —Roosevelt, Stalin and
Churchill. When Mikolajczyk resigned and was replaced by Arciszewski, the new
London Government in exile had clearly become anti-Soviet.[10]
Churchill and Roosevelt, therefore, arrived in Yalta facing, on the one
hand, the fait accompli of the Polish
Provisional Government supported and recognized by the USSR and, on the other
hand, the London Government that was irreconcilable in its views. The Secretary
of State, Edward Stettinius, had already prepared a
memorandum of suggested action items for the President. In the case of Poland
the US favored the Curzon line in the east with the town of Lwow remaining in
Poland and a transfer of German territory limited to East Prussia (a small
coasted salient of Pomerania) and Upper Silesia (Map 1). The
USA also supported the formation of a new representative government that would
hold free elections when conditions permitted. Inclusion of Mikolajczyk in a
provisional government was considered to be important but the Lublin government
was not going to be recognized in its present form.[11]
In this case, the Americans did not follow the policy of just diplomacy
at it refers to the nationalities. Although the Curzon line was not the best
solution for Poland and did not compensate the country for what it had suffered
during the war, it would appease the Russians and clear their grievances related
to the greater Poland of the interwar period. At the same time with Lwow
remaining Polish there would be no common border between Czechoslovakia and the
USSR and the latter would be far away from Hungary and Central Europe. The
western allies wanted as little Russian influence in this part of Europe as
possible. As far as the western Polish frontier was concerned, the Americans
offered Poland territory inhabited mainly by Germans and including East Prussia.
The inclusion of East Prussia would solve the irregularities that had been
observed with Wilson's policy of self-determination of populations, according to
which Germany was cut into two pieces because of the Polish Corridor to Danzig.
Last but not least, free elections were considered essential so that an imposed
government composed by communists would be avoided.
Although, therefore, the two first days of the Conference were devoted to
the discussion of the German problem or to informative meetings, on 6 February
1945 the discussion turned to Poland. President Roosevelt opened the discussion
on Poland by saying that he believed Americans were in favor of the Curzon line
and looked forward for a representative government in Poland that would be
composed of the leaders of the five political parties.[12]
Churchill confirmed that the British government was in favor of the Curzon line
(Lwow though remaining in the USSR) because Britain believed that a "strong, free and independent Poland was much
more important than particular territorial boundaries." Churchill claimed
that it was because he trusted the declarations of Stalin about the sovereignty
and independence of Poland that he placed the frontier issue second, meaning
they could be discussed later on.[13]
The British Prime Minister said that the Polish Government in London was
recognized by his country. Although he himself had had no contact with it, he
felt that Mikolajczyk, Gralski and Pouner (members of the London Government)
were all honest men. Churchill also suggested the creation of a government for
Poland to hold elections.[14]
Stalin began his speech by saying that the Polish question was for the
Soviet Union an issue of both honor and security because both countries had
long-lived disputes between themselves and a strong Poland would not become
again "a corridor for attack on
Russia."[15]
Stalin was very much against the Curzon line because it left Bialystok (or
Belostok) and the Bialystoc region to Poland (Map 1).[16]
It seems that the Russians would feel more secure with a Russo-Polish border
along the two rivers west of Bialystok. Stalin was also very critical of
Churchill's proposal to create a Polish government in Yalta and said that "a Polish government could be set up only
with the participation and consent of the Poles." He claimed that the London
Government dropped Mikolajczyk because it did not want to come to an agreement
with the Lublin Government. Moreover, he said that the latter refused to hear of
any unity with the government in exile. Stalin was upset because he wanted
tranquility in the Red Army's rear and he had information that some underground
forces had killed 212 Soviet soldiers. Therefore, according to him, the Warsaw
Government turned out to be useful and the London Government and its agents in
Poland, harmful in this war against the Germans. Stalin concluded that he would
support the government that would give peace in the rear of the Russian army.[17]
Roosevelt said nothing.
That same night Roosevelt, after he consulted with Churchill, sent a
letter to Stalin, part of which read as follows:
In so far as the Polish Government
is concerned, I am greatly disturbed that the three Great Powers do not have a
meeting of mind about the political set up in Poland. It seems to me that it
puts all of us in a bad light throughout the world to have you recognizing one
government while we and the British are recognizing another in London
[...]
[...] I would like to develop your proposal a little and suggest that we
invite here to Yalta at once Mr Bierut and Mr Osubka Morawski from the Lublin
Government and also two or three from the following list of Poles [representing
...] the other elements of the Polish people. [...] We could jointly agree with
them on a provisional government in Poland which should no doubt include some
Polish leaders from abroad such as Mr Mikolajczyk, Mr Gralski, and Mr Romer
[...][18]
Most
probably, the Americans foresaw the dangers that the open question of the
formation of a representative Polish government had created and rushed to make
their ideas clear before the next meeting. It seems though that the opportunity
to exercise pressure on Stalin was missed when Roosevelt remained silent in the
last meeting during the day.
The next day (7 February 1945) Stalin stated that he had received the
President's letter but he was not sure if there would be enough time for both
the representatives of the Lublin Poles and those of the London Government to
come to the Crimea.[19]
In this way Stalin postponed any real action of the delegations at the
Conference to solve the problem of the Polish government immediately. Moreover,
he suggested that the American legation
listened to the proposals Molotov had worked out. Molotov proposed that
(1) the Curzon line would be the eastern frontier of Poland; (2) the Polish
western frontier would run from the town of Stettin (Polish) to the south along
the rivers Oder and West Neisse (Map 1 and Map 2); (3)
some democratic leaders from Polish emigre
circles would be added to the provisional Government; (4) the enlarged
Provisional Government would be recognized by the Allies; and (5) would call the
Poles to polls as soon as possible.[20]
Stalin tried to prove his good intentions by accepting the Curzon line and
compensating Poland with German territory in the west. He also accepted the idea
of "emigres"
Poles, as he called them, in the future government. Stalin might have thought
that he had nothing to loose by promising the allies what they had more or less
actually demanded, since the Red Army had virtually occupied the whole of Poland
and was now approaching Berlin (Map 3: Front line
8 February 1945).
Both Roosevelt and Churchill were embarrassed with the word "emigre"
that was used and Churchill proposed to change it to "Poles temporarily abroad,"
to which Stalin agreed. Churchill was also not satisfied with the western Polish
boundaries and particularly concerning the area west of the river Oder (Map 1). Those
territories, continued Churchill, were heavily populated by Germans and the
Russian proposal would involve a movement of German population. "It would be a great pity to stuff the Polish
goose so full of German food that it died of indigestion," concluded the
British Prime Minister. But Stalin assured him that the Soviet Army would leave
no Germans in this area.[21]
Meanwhile, Stettinius passed to the President the following written
warning: "Have we the authority to deal
with a boundary question of this kind, giving a guarantee?" When Churchill
began to speak, Roosevelt wrote on a piece of paper: "Now we are in for 1/2 hour of it."[22]
Stettinius wanted to warn Roosevelt that they might be involved in a frontier
question that could be discussed again after the end of the war under new
circumstances. It seems that Roosevelt was thinking that the primary aim of the
Conference was to show the world that there was agreement of decisions among the
Big Three.
In the morning of 8 February Roosevelt sent a letter to Stalin regarding
the Soviet proposal for Poland. The American delegation was not in favor of the
extension of the western Polish frontier up to western Neisse river. Moreover,
the Americans proposed that Polish leaders from both governments be invited to
the Crimea to form a "Polish Government of National Unity." A Presidential
Committee would also be formed and would undertake the formation of the
government of National Unity composed of representatives from the Warsaw
Government, from elements inside Poland, and from Poles abroad. The immediate
action of that government would be the organization of elections. The new Polish
Government of National Unity would be recognized by all three Governments of the
Crimean Conference as the Provisional Government of Poland.[23]
It took the Americans another whole night to realize that the western Neisse
frontier line was unacceptable.
Molotov answered the American proposal for a government of National Unity
by stating that the Soviet Union felt that it would be better to enlarge the
existing Warsaw Government because it enjoyed great prestige and popularity in
Poland. On the other hand, Mikolajczyk, Grabski, and Witos had not been
connected with the events of the liberation of the country. He was against the
creation of a Presidential Committee but in favor of the enlargement of the
existed National Council. On the question of the frontier, Molotov was sure that
the Polish will was in accordance with the Soviet proposal.[24]
When Molotov talked about the enlargement, Stettinius sent the following written
message to the President: "Mr President:
Not to enlarge Lublin but to form a new Gov. of some kind."[25]
The Americans feared that Stalin's friends would be the majority in the enlarged
government.
Churchill
intervened at this point saying that a lack of agreement on the recognition of
one Polish Government only would stamp the meeting "with the seal of failure."
He stated that the British were informed that the Warsaw Government was not
accepted by the majority of the Poles. Moreover, he said that he did not agree
with the London Government's actions and he proposed free general elections in
Poland with universal suffrage and free candidatures. Britain, he continued,
would then recognize the government regardless of the attitude of the Polish
Government in London.[26]
It is worth noting that that same day the British delegation circulated its own
proposals. They proposed that the western frontier of Poland included the free
city of Danzig, the region of East Prussia, west and south of Konigsberg,
the administrative district of Oppelm in Silesia, and the lands desired by
Poland east of the Oder line (Map 1). An
exchange of the Polish and German populations of the above area was suggested as
well as the establishment of a Polish government representing all democratic
elements of the country. Elections would be held as soon as possible.[27]
On 9 February at noon the Foreign Ministers Stettinius, Molotov, and Eden
met at the Livadia Palace to discuss the Polish question. Stettinius dropped the
American proposal on the creation of a Presidential Committee. However, he
suggested the following formula:
[...] the present Polish
Provisional Government be recognized into a fully representative government
based on all democratic forces in Poland abroad, to be termed "The Provisional
Government of National Unity" [...] This "Government of National Unity would be
pledged to the holding of free and unfetter selections as soon as practicable on
the basis of universal suffrage and secret ballot in which all democratic
parties would have the right to participate and to put forward
candidates."
When a "Provisional Government of National Unity" is satisfactorily
formed, the three Governments will then proceed to accord its
recognition.[28]
Molotov
asked to study the Russian translation first and Eden pointed out that he was
against an action in favor of the Lublin Government because it would involve
complicated issues of recognition in respect to the London Government. He also
insisted on the formation of a new government in Poland.[29]
In the plenary meeting of the same day Molotov asked for the substitution
of the first sentence of Stettinius draft with the
following:
The Present Provisional Government
of Poland should be recognized on a wider democratic basis with the inclusion of
democratic leaders from Poland itself and from those living abroad, and in this
connection this government would be called the National Provisional Government
of Poland.[30]
Molotov
also asked for the addition of the words "non-Fascist and anti-Fascist" before
the words "democratic parties" in the last sentence of the paragraph.[31]
After a half-hour intermission Roosevelt said that he proposed the change of the
first words of Molotov's suggestion. Instead of the "Provisional Government" he
proposed the use of the words "The Government now operating in Poland". He also
expressed the view that there should be an inclusion for the desire of free
elections that was expected by the six million Poles in the United States.[32]
Stalin agreed with the amendment of the President.[33]
On the same day at the meeting of the Foreign Ministers Molotov disagreed
on the last sentence proposed by Stettinius which read as
follows:
The Three governments recognizing
their responsibility as a result of the present agreement for the future right
of the Polish people freely to choose the government and institutions under
which they are to live, will receive reports on this subject from their
ambassadors in Warsaw.[34]
The
question on the inclusion of the above sentence was left to the Big Three
Meeting next day.
On 10 February 1945 at the meeting of the Foreign Ministers Stettinius
stated that the Polish question had given serious study and that the American
delegation was prepared to withdraw the last sentence which Molotov had objected
to.[35]
The new formula therefore included the following points: (1) the Polish
Provisional Government would be recognized after the inclusion of democratic
leaders from Poland and from Poles abroad; (2) the new Provisional Polish
Government of National Unity would organize elections; (3) after the formation
of the new government, the United States, the Soviet Union, and Britain would
establish diplomatic relations with Poland and the ambassadors would report to
the respective governments about the situation in the country.[36]
Churchill disagreed on the formula because it did not make any mention of
frontiers. He believed that the British War Cabinet would not accept the line of
the western Neisse.[37]
At this point Stettinius informed the President that he was told by Eden that he
had received a "bad" cable from the Cabinet which expressed its fear that the
British delegation was going too far. Meanwhile Harry Hopkins of the American
mission scribbled to Roosevelt the following note:
Mr President:-
I think you should make clear to Stalin that you support the eastern
boundaries but that only a general statement be put in communiqué saying we are
considering essential boundary changes. Might be well to refer exact statement
to foreign ministers.
Harry[38]
Roosevelt
told the plenary session that he believed that the Polish Government should be
consulted before any statement was made in regard to the western frontier.
Stalin and Churchill proposed that the same action should be taken for the
eastern frontier too. Molotov, therefore, suggested that he should form a last
sentence on the Polish formula.[39]
Almost at the end of the meeting of that day, President Roosevelt said that he
had to propose some small amendments concerning the frontiers of Poland and the
respective formula.[40]
The changes were accepted by the conference and the final draft read as
follows:
The Three Heads of Government
[instead of "the three powers"] consider that the eastern frontier of Poland
should follow the Curzon line with digressions from it in some regions of five
to eight kilometres in favor of Poland. It is recognized that Poland must
receive substantial accession of territory in the North and West. They feel
[instead of "agree"] that the opinion of the new Polish Provisional Government
of National Unity should be sought in due course on the extent of these
accessions and the final delimitation of the Western frontier of Poland should
thereafter await the Peace Conference.[41]
The text was finally approved by all parts and Roosevelt announced that
he had to leave by 3 p.m. the next day and a committee was appointed to prepare
the Conference communiqué. The communiqué on Poland noted the enlargement of the
Polish Provisional Government which would hold "free and unfettered" elections;
the recognition of the Curzon line as the eastern frontier of Poland; and that
the western frontier would be settled at the Peace Conference.[42]
By the end of the Yalta Conference, Poland and almost all of eastern
Europe was controlled by the Red Army. Stettinius claimed that "as a result of this military situation, it
was not a question of what Great Britain and the United States would permit
Russia to do in Poland, but what the two countries could persuade the Soviet
Union to accept."[43]
Problems and dissatisfaction with the agreements at the Yalta Conference were
expressed a few months after the end of the meeting. On 1 April 1945 Churchill
wrote to Stalin that he was embarrassed because the "new" and "recognized"
Polish Government had not been established yet, because the "Soviet or Lublin
Government" vetoed any invitation to Poles abroad that they did not approve. He
also mentioned the fact that Molotov withdrew his offer to allow observers or
missions to enter Poland.[44]
Stalin answered to Churchill's complaints by complaints. He claimed that the
"Polish question had indeed reached an impasse," because of the attitude of the
British and American ambassadors in Moscow. According to Stalin they ignored the
Polish Provisional Government and they wanted to invite Polish leaders from
abroad who did not recognize the decisions of Yalta.[45]
Apart from the British, however, Poles in America were also disturbed in 1945 by
the agreement on the boundaries. Congressmen of Polish origin[46]
as well as Polish-American organizations denounced the Curzon line as being
another partition of Poland. The Curzon line after all was the old
Ribendrop-Molotov line that had divided Poland between Russia and Germany.
Congressman O'Konski declared that "without a free Poland there can be no free
Europe or a free world. The fate of Poland will determine whether the war has
been won or lost."[47]
The American Secretary of State, E. Stettinius, provided a balance sheet at the
end of his book on the Yalta Conference. His opinion is that the agreement on
Poland was more or less a concession by Stalin to both Roosevelt and Churchill.
"It was not exactly what we wanted, but,
on the other hand, it was not exactly what the Soviet Union wanted,"[48]concluded
Stettinius. (Map
4)
Stettinius had definitely
the impression that in the case of Poland the Americans and the British had not
allowed Stalin a free hand in Poland. The close study of the documents shows,
though, that all three sides were afraid of one another. All three had agreed
that they wanted the creation of a territorially unified Poland. They agreed on
the eastern frontier along the Curzon line. In this way the Russians received
what they had been asking for the last forty years. The western allies wanted to
show Stalin that they would satisfy the territorial appetite of Russia in that
area and at the same time Stalin would help them with Germany and most important
with the final phase of the war against Japan.
For a moment, the western frontier seemed to have created new problems.
Stalin at the beginning insisted on the Polish acquisition of an area
(Neisse-Oder) heavily populated by Germans, in an attempt to appease the Lublin
Government. In the future that regime would declare that although the Poles lost
to the Russians an area that historically was part of the old 17th century
Jaggelonian Empire (Poland-Lithuania) in the east, they were compensated with
Eastern Prussia and the area up to the Neisse river. Finally Stalin agreed to
the reconsideration of the western frontier issue. This move was interpreted by
Stettinius as a retreat but it seems that Stalin was not quite sure on what
points he could exercise pressure on the western allies. On the question of the
Polish government it appears that Stalin was more interested in a regime that
would be friendly to the Russians rather than to a purely communist government
in Poland. That is why at the end he yielded to the formation of a government
recognized by all three governments. Of course, he tried to postpone any real
action on this matter for latter on when the Russians would have complete
control of Poland and might not need the allies to finish that war. All in all,
Stalin was assured in Yalta that the Americans and the British would more or
less agree to his plans concerning Poland. Stalin should have left Yalta
satisfied with what he had achieved on the Polish issue.
The British, on the other hand, had to face the London Government which
had showed no cooperation and finally denounced the Yalta agreements. Churchill
had to go back to Britain and assure the British cabinet that the Big Three had
solved the Polish question in the best possible way. Stalin had accepted the
participation of "Poles from abroad" in the Provisional Government of Poland; an
independent Poland would be created in accordance with the British policy
concerning this country; Stalin had promised free elections. Churchill was not
so naive to be convinced of what the Russian bear had told them in Yalta. Yet,
the western allied forces needed the Russians desperately in early 1945. In
early February the western allies were just recovering from the German attack.
They needed the Russians to exercise more pressure on the eastern front or even
siege Berlin (Map 3) to
force the Germans to relieve pressure on the western front. Churchill,
therefore, left Yalta satisfied that at least Stalin would not abandon his
allies now that he was winning his part of the war and that at least legally he
had bound himself to a free and independent Poland. The British knew that they
could trust the Americans more than they could believe in Stalin's
promises.
It seems that the Americans reacted last in the Conference at Yalta. Was
it because Roosevelt had just won his third Presidential elections in the autumn
of 1944 and was very tired with a failing health? Well, it appears that his
advisers were alert and made suggestion during the actual meeting. The
President, though, needed time to think and discuss probably over and over the
various possibilities usually during the night. Then the Americans reacted to
what was usually a talk of Churchill and Stalin during the day. Was Roosevelt to
blame for the fate of Poland? FDR had just won the elections and was definitely
not concerned for the time being with the Americans of Polish origin in the USA.
He was very much interested, though, in the course of the war. The Russians were
very close to Berlin and the Americans had to rush to meet them there but that
would not be the end of the war. The Americans thought that they needed the help
of Stalin in the war against a still very powerful Japan (as they thought),
which could last for months or even years after the defeat of Germany. The
President could now go back to Washington hoping that Stalin would respect the
alliance after the end of the war in Europe.
In the final analysis all three leaders left the Crimea confident that at
least they had not broken off the alliance, an act that Hitler would appreciate
and hope reading over and over how Frederick the Great escaped from complete
destruction in the 18th century. The Prussian Emperor was saved at the last
crucial moment before the collapse of his army when the coalition against him
was dissolved. Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin left the Crimea assured that each
one had won that round in the game of international politics. Stalin had
acquired the eastern part of Poland and an acceptance of the presence of
communism in the future government of Poland. Churchill had secured the
participation of Poles from abroad in the future government and that would, at
least, be appreciated in London. Roosevelt had assured the entry of the USSR in
the war in the Pacific and had not allowed Stalin a free hand in
Poland.
History has proven that all three were deceived in Yalta by one another.
The use of the atomic bomb ended the war faster than they expected and Russian
assistance was not that an important factor. Britain could not afford to play
the role of a world power any more and passed the baton to the USA, which felt
that had to protect the principles of the republic all over the world and
therefore could not trust the untrustworthy: the Russians. Stalin, on the other
hand, saw that he could not trust the Americans who had the power now to destroy
any part of the world. He had to protect the Soviet Union by allowing the
descent of an "iron curtain" between eastern Europe and the West. President
Roosevelt, Prime Minister Churchill and Marshal Stalin used Yalta in the Crimea
as a summer resort in the cold winter days of February
1945.
*
* *
NOTES
[1] US Department of State, "The President's Log at Yalta," The Conferences at Malta and Yalta, 1945 [Diplomatic Papers] (Washington: GPO, 1955), p. 551 ; A. H. Birse, Memoirs of an Interpreter (New Yotk: Coward-McCann, 1967), p. 179.
[2] Birse, p. 182.
[3] Herbert Feis, Churchill, Roosevelt, Stalin, 2nd ed. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1967), p. 522 ; Robert A. Divine, Roosevelt and World War II (Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1969), p. 91 ; Winston Churchill, Triumph and Tragedy (Cambridge, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin, 1953), p. 366.
[4] At the Paris Peace Conference of 1919 the issue of the Ruso-Polish frontier was not solved because Russia was not represented at the meeting. However, in the text of the Treaty of Versailles a proposal was included for a tentative frontier, known as the Curzon line [Sidney Harcave, Russia: A History, 5th ed. (New York: Lippincott, 1964), p. 538].
[5] Charles F. Delzell, "Russian Power in Central-Eastern Europe," in The Meaning of Yalta, edited by J. N. Snell (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Univ. Press, 1956), p. 37.
[6] Harcave, pp. 683-84.
[7] Stalin to Churchill, 3 January 1945, in Stalin's Correspondence with Churchill, Attlee, Roosevelt, and Truman (1941-1945) (Moscow: FLPH, 1957 ; rpt. New York: Dutton, 1958), pp. 289-90 ; Stalin was not probably thinking of exporting the Russian revolution to Europe at this point in time (See arguments in Isaac Deutscher, Stalin: A Political Biography (N. York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1966), pp. 536-37.
[8] Stalin to Roosevelt, 27 December 1944, Correspondence, p. 181.
[9] Churchill to Stalin, 5 January 1945, in Stalin's Correspondence, p. 239 ; Roosevelt to Stalin, 31 December 1944, in Stalin's Correspondence, pp. 182-183.
[10] Feis, p. 520 ; William L. Newman, After Victory (New York: Harper & Row, 1967), pp. 127-128 ; Gadis Smith, American Diplomacy during the Second World War, 1941-1945 (New York: Wiley, 1965), p. 142
[11] US, Department of State, p. 568 ; A survey of the Yalta meeting with extracts of the discussion concerning Poland along with the declaration after the end of the Conference can be found in Edward J. Rozek, Allied Wartime Diplomacy: A Pattern in Poland, (N. York: Wiles, 1958), pp. 338-356.
[12] US, Department of State, p. 667 ; In the March 1930 elections the five major parties were a) the National Democrat Party (8.2% of the total vote), b) Wyzwolenie et al. left party (14.7%), c) the Socialist party (13.1%), d) the Joint list of the National Minorities party (18.7%) and e) the Nonpartisan Block for Cooperation with the Government or BBWR left party et al. (24%) [Joseph Rothschild, East Central Europe between the Two World Wars (Seattle: Univ. of Washington Press, 1974), p. 63].
[13] Churchill, p. 368.
[14] Department of State, p. 668 ; Robert Beitzell, ed., Tehran, Yalta, Potsdam: The Soviet Protocols (Hat-tiesburg, Miss.: Academic International, 1969, pp. 86-87 [hereafter cited as Soviet Protocols.]
[15] Department of State, p. 669.
[16] Soviet Protocols, p. 88 ; Churchill tried to overlook this old demand of Russia and he supported the claims of the Soviet Union in the area of Lwow (Map 2) [Churchill, p. 367]. Roosevelt, however, insisted that Lwow remains Polish (see Stettinius memorandum in this paper in page 3 above).
[17] Department of State, pp. 679-81 ; Soviet Protocols, pp. 87-90.
[18] Roosevelt to Stalin, Koreiz, the Crimea, 6 February 1945, in Stalin's Correspondence, pp. 187-189 ; Churchill claims in his book Triumph and Tragedy that Roosevelt consulted him before he sent the letter and that he was also in favor of that solution (Churchill, p. 372).
[19] Department of State, p. 711 ; Soviet Protocols, p. 92 ; Stettinius claims that the American delegation was not surprised by the Soviet announcement of proposals because it had been informed by Churchill [Edward Stettinius, Roosevelt and the Russians: The Yalta Conference (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubeday, 1949), p. 172].
[20] Department of State, p. 716 ; Soviet Protocols, pp. 96-97 ; Churchill, p. 373 ; Stettinius, pp. 181-82.
[21] Department of State, p. 717 ; Churchill, p. 374 ; Soviet Protocols, pp. 97-98.
[22] Stettinus, pp. 182 and 184.
[23] Department of State, pp. 792-93.
[24] Department of State, pp. 776-78 ; Churchill, pp. 377-78 ; Molotov's objection is omitted from the Soviet minutes of the session.
[25] Stettinius, p. 213.
[26] Churchill, pp. 378-79 ; Soviet Protocols, pp. 104-105 ; Department of State, pp. 778-79.
[27] Department of State, pp. 869-70 ; Churchill refers to the same document as an Anglo-American revised proposal (Churchill, pp. 375-76).
[28] Department of State, p. 804 ; The authorship of this document is not indicated on the original.
[29] Ibid.
[30] Department of State, p. 842.
[31] Ibid.
[32] Department of State, p. 842 ; Soviet Protocols, p. 113 ; Stettinius, p. 240.
[33] Soviet Protocols, p. 117 ; There is a discrepancy in this point. In Bohlen Minutes this sentences is omitted. In Matthew's Minutes it is recorded that Stalin said that he could form the first words as follows: "The Polish Government which acts in Poland" (Department of State, p. 854).
[34] Department of State, p. 868 ; This proposal of the American Secretary of State is not recorded in Stettinius’s book.
[35] Department of State, p. 872 ; Stettinius justified that step backward of the American delegation claiming that he had a meeting with the President that morning and that they both were anxious to reach an agreement with the other governments. "We did not wish to prevent a Polish settlement by insisting on the last sentence of our formula [...]", concluded the Secretary of State (Stettinius, p. 251).
[36] Department of State, p. 898 ; Stettinius, p. 259 ; Churchill claimed that the last provision about the ambassadors and their reports was agreed upon between him and Stalin in a private conversation. "This was the best I could get", concluded Churchill (Churchill, p. 385).
[37] Department of State, p. 898 ; Churchill, p. 386 ; Soviet Protocols, p. 119
[38] Stettinius, p. 260.
[39] Soviet Protocols, pp. 119-120 ; Department of State, p. 899 ; Churchill, p. 386.
[40] Roosevelt was warned by both Stettinius and Hopkins on the constitutional problems for the United States involved in the Polish frontier settlement (Stettinius, pp. 183 & 270).
[41] Department of State, p. 905.
[42] The complete text on the Polish question appears in the Appendix.
[43] Stettinius, p. 301.
[44] Churchill to Stalin, 1 April 1945, Stalin's Correspondence, pp. 309-10.
[45] Stalin to Churchill, 7 April 1945, op. cit., pp. 314-16.
[46] Republican Alvin O'Konski from Wisconsin, and Democrats Thaddens Wasillnski from Wisconsin and Joseph Ryter from Connecticut.
[47] Quoted in Athan G. Theocharis. The Yalta Myths (Columbia: Univ. of Missouri Press, 1970), p. 28.
[48]
Stettinius, p. 303.
LINKS
The yalta
Conference Documents http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/wwii/yalta.htm
Modern History
Sourcebook: The Yalta Conference, Feb. 1945 http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1945YALTA.html